Xray Alternative: Test Discovery Over Test Management (2026)
Xray is the Jira-native test management plugin. If your team lives in Jira, Xray feels natural — test cases next to tickets, traceability from requirement to result. What it does not do is find bugs.
Xray is the Jira-native test management plugin. If your team lives in Jira, Xray feels natural — test cases next to tickets, traceability from requirement to result. What it does not do is find bugs. It manages the tracking of tests that humans wrote. For teams that want coverage to grow automatically from what is actually there, Xray alone is half the story.
What Xray does
- Test cases as Jira issues
- Test runs, test plans, test executions
- Traceability: requirement → test → execution → defect
- Requirements coverage reporting
- Robust Jira workflows (gates, approvals)
For Jira-centric teams, the cognitive overhead is near zero — it is just more Jira.
Where Xray struggles
Still requires writing cases. Every test case is authored by a human. No discovery, no exploration.
Test execution is manual. Xray tracks runs; it does not run anything. Runs happen in whatever automation framework you maintain separately.
Coverage is what you wrote. If you did not write a case for the dead button on the settings screen, Xray shows 100% passed with the bug untouched.
Report load on QA. Compliance teams love it. QA teams maintain it.
What SUSA adds
Autonomous exploration. SUSA drives your app with 10 personas, classifies every step's outcome, reports flow verdicts, detects issues, and generates Appium / Playwright regression scripts. The "coverage" becomes what exists, not what was imagined.
Integration with Jira/Xray: every discovered issue can be filed as a Jira issue automatically. Regression scripts map to Xray tests once you create them there.
Xray vs SUSA
| Xray | SUSA | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use | Case tracking in Jira | Autonomous exploration |
| Writes cases | You | Not required |
| Runs tests | No | Yes (discovery) |
| Generates tests | No | Yes |
| Jira native | Yes | Integration |
| Requirement coverage | Yes | Coverage by discovery |
| Best pairing | Compliance-heavy | Any product team |
When to keep Xray
Regulated industries, Jira-first workflow, compliance demands auditable requirement-to-test traceability. Xray is the right tool; SUSA complements it with discovery.
How they pair
- SUSA explores → exports regression scripts
- Scripts uploaded to Jenkins / GitHub Actions → execution results push to Xray
- Discovered issues auto-create Jira bugs with SUSA-linked screenshots / repro
- Xray shows requirement → discovered test → pass/fail → linked defect
Start
pip install susatest-agent
susatest-agent test myapp.apk --persona curious --steps 200 --jira-integration
Xray without discovery is half a QA stack. Add the other half.
Test Your App Autonomously
Upload your APK or URL. SUSA explores like 10 real users — finds bugs, accessibility violations, and security issues. No scripts.
Try SUSA Free